Kendall Jenner says quotes about Bruce Jenner in Us Weekly interview never happened

Bruce Jenner Kendall Jenner together

As we reported earlier, Us Weekly published an article today in which they claim to have spoken to Kendall Jenner backstage at the Justin Bieber Comedy Central roast about Bruce Jenner’s reported transition. “I will always love my dad, whether he’s a man or a woman,” Kendall allegedly told the site.

The article has outraged Kendall because she claims she never said the things Us Weekly attributed to her, and that the whole interview never even took place! “How is it legal for someone to ‘quote’ someone and publish it if in fact you never said what was quoted?” Kendall asked on Twitter.

She later added, “Shame on US Weekly for making up quotes. I NEVER said those things. I never spoke to them.”

The whole thing is REALLY bizarre because Us Weekly quotes Kendall extensively, not just about her dad, but about her modeling career, her sisters, and her dating life. Did they really make all of that up?

At the time of this post the Us Weekly article is still up and there has been no official statement from them about the validity of their “interview.” My theory is that Jimmy Kimmel planted celebrity lookalikes backstage to do fake interviews. (When I wrote that I meant it as completely silly, but realizing this was a Comedy Central roast, I’m starting to think it’s not that crazy. Although I would have expected quotes that were way more crazy.)

Stay tuned!

web analytics

Pin It
  • kardashian meltdown

    I feel bad for what Bruce is going through. Its none of anyone’s business until he says something to address it publicly. These magazines have zero liablity if you ask me. But if you honestly believe what’s in the trash mags then there’s a bigger problem.

    • spottedgiraffe

      I would feel bad if he didn’t sign up for showing the world his personal life by going on a reality show. It’s not like he’s an actor whose work has nothing to do with his real life.

  • spottedgiraffe

    Either kendall can’t remember the interview because she was on drugs or US weekly is pathetically desperate. Both are equally possible.

  • Guest

    This is why I’m having a hard time believing all this hoopla about Bruce. Tabloids are all trash and lies. Bruce hasn’t came forward and said he wants to be a woman; therefore, I don’t believe it yet.

  • Ashley

    Usweekly is going to have to release the recording. You can’t attribute quotes to someone famous like that if you don’t have proof. They would have paraphrased. I bet money they have solid proof.

  • Sarah

    I think Kris has demanded the entire family stay silent on the issue so they can get a bigger payday when they officially release the story. Kendall is an idiot and did the interview and is now claiming it all to be a lie since Kris is flipping out on her.

    • Brewblaz

      She won’t flip too much, she knows where her bread is coming from in the future.

    • Guest



  • mb

    US Weekly is doing what other tabloids do, write fake stories, with fake quotes, etc. Sometime celebs overlook the story and sometimes they don’t like now. I don’t blame Kendall for speaking out about this lie from a tabloid.

  • SneakyCentipede

    The thing that made me think it wasn’t her was the whole “change his shoes” comment. 1. She’s not that witty. 2. If he is infact transitioning, this is still a very raw emotional time for them all, I don’t think any family member would be at the point of making jokes, especially his young daughter. It just seems weird, who knows your theory about the Kendall look-a-like is actually the best explaination I’ve heard

  • savannah

    As much as I think this whole family are a bunch of fame hungry pigs, in this situation its not a hard stretch to believe that US Weekly is lying. How many Brangelina/Jennifer Anniston false stories have they ran with “insiders” giving pregnancy or divorce quotes. I don’t think if nobody else in the family has actually said anything about it, that Kendall would be the one to give an exclusive.