Gossip Girl’s Kelly Rutherford denied custody request, vows to appeal
          

Kelly-Rutherford

The international custody war rages on between former Gossip Girl star Kelly Rutherford and her German businessman ex-husband Daniel Giersch.

E! News is reporting that a judge has recently ruled in favor of Giersch, who will maintain physical custody of the couple’s children Hermes (7) and Helena (3). The father will no longer be required to transport his children from Monaco to New York City, where Rutherford lives.

Rutherford filed bankruptcy earlier this year after spending “$1.5 million on the divorce and custody battle.” Court documents claim that Rutherford has $2,021,832 in debts and assets that total $23,937.

Giersch’s American visa was revoked in 2012 and a judge ruled months later that the children must live in Monaco with their dad. It was deemed that Rutherford’s schedule was flexible enough to allow her to do the necessary traveling.

Kelly, who acts as her own attorney and plans an appeal, told E!:

“It strikes me as outrageous and unconstitutional that children can be effectively deported in order to accommodate their exiled father, with no proof of why he can’t be in the U.S.”

The 45-year-old is set to pick up her children in France and bring them back to the U.S. for the holidays. Kelly claims that she has made 45 back and forth trips since the couple’s custody battle began in 2009.

Kelly Rutherford and children
Kelly Rutherford with Hermes and Helena – 08/11/2013

To highlight just how embittered the split has become, a judge earlier this month ordered the two to “exchange polite and friendly greetings” when dropping off and picking up their children. In certain cases, like if one of the kids doesn’t want to leave one parent they have to abide by the following script:

To the child: “Have a great time with [other parent]. I’ll talk to you tomorrow.”

To the other parent: “[Name], please come and help me.”

Rutherford is scheduled to speak at a National Organization for Women luncheon in Washington D.C. today about her case.


hits counter

spacer
  • No items
    • LexiconD1

      This is part of the reason you don’t have kids with a foreigner. When you lose, you lose it all…

      • Steph

        I have a child with a foreigner, and I am the mother, in my country the woman has all the rights, it doesn´t matter if the father cannot enter the country, the children always stay with the mother so blame the USA in this case!

    • ameliaBedelia76

      Can someone remind me why she lost custody in the first place

      • hmm.

        The dad isn’t allowed in the US and she tried to cut him out of their life.

        • ameliaBedelia76

          so she was a big-ole-b***h and wound up losing her kids to a man in another country? WOW. somehow that doesnt sound right.

      • DeeDeDee

        Unless there is something she isn’t sharing, it sounds like thejudge was almoat punishing her for being a working mother. He gave custody to HIM because “she has a flexible schedule that can allow her to fly back and forth. “

    • Kara

      Why don’t they have shared custody? Poor Kelly.

    • tankyounotes

      This saga has always seemed off to me. It’s so rare that a fit mother loses custody of her children. And then they live in another country? SOMETHING is being hidden about this case…

 

Advertisement: