French magazine “Closer” publishes Kate Middleton, Duchess Catharine topless photos
          

Kate Middleton topless Closer cover

Newlyweds Kate Middleton and Prince William recently went on vacation to France and stayed at the Queen’s nephew’s chateau, which they thought had a private balcony. The Princess decided to do a little sunbathing sans bikini top, and was caught on camera by a rather industrious photographer. The Kate Middleton topless photos found their way into (and on the cover of!) the French magazine Closer, and needless to say, the royal family is fuming. They are even threatening a lawsuit against the mag.

UPDATE - The royal family is moving forward with their lawsuit while Italian magazine Chi publishes more of the Kate Middleton topless pictures! Click for more info and pictures from Chi.

Shortly after the photos of Princess Kate were made public, the Royal family released the following statement:

“Their royal highnesses have been hugely saddened to learn that a French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and totally unjustifiable manner. Their royal highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house. It is unthinkable that anyone should take such photographs, let alone publish them.”

The family also added that the incident was “reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales.” They also revealed that officials working for Kate and William are meeting with lawyers to see what options are available to them as far as taking legal action against Closer.

After the scandal broke, the magazine’s UK counterpart quickly announced that their independence from the French version, insisting that the publications make independent decisions when it comes to their publications. “Closer magazine UK takes its obligations under the PCC Code extremely seriously and would never publish topless images of a member of the Royal family on its cover or otherwise.”

The royal family’s private parts have been all over the web this summer. First, Prince Harry was caught with his pants down in Las Vegas, then a few weeks later, 91-year-old Prince Phillippe flashed his member while going panty-free in a kilt.


Follow Us





spacer

You also might like

spacer
  • No items
    • Jenn G.

      How sad that they can not have a private vacation without fear of being spied on by the media.

    • manakahu

      what is sad is that the royals know they are photographed every where and all the time; yet, even so she decided to go topless??? Oh please… when you are a public figure the reality, no matter how sad and despicable, is that you cannot have such public private moments. wanna go topless? do it in your backyard with very high fences surrounding you. sad, but that is their reality.

      • Jenn G.

        Actually they were at a private secluded chateau on private property. So pretty much like being in their own backyard with very high fences.

        • dd

          Not very high though!

    • http://twitter.com/RudyMack1 Rudy Mack

      Shape shifting t!ts, family of lizards, reptilians everywhere.

      • Karen

        What does this mean?

    • Steve

      In any European resort topless bathing is common place, it’s only the
      anal retentives who have an issue with it. She has tits, so what? Stop
      acting so puritanically. Pathetic over reaction to a non-issue. A
      story made for it’s own sake.

    • raju

      This royal family is a big joke on the British public.

      • BOMBA777

        If you dig you’ll discover that far from being a joke, they, along with their close friends the Rothchild’s, run the entire bloody world. People don’t seem to be aware that when England decided to stop fighting the American Civil War they lost nothing, the foundations, namely industry & financial institutions remained in the original owners hands

    • Ashley

      Why is it a big deal that she was sunbathing topless? She was with her husband, sunbathing, at a private home in France…so what, seems pretty normal and low key. What is a big deal here, is how the paparazzi invaded and violated her privacy and are trying to cause a sensation by publishing the photos.

    • hawkeye

      its another form of sexual harrassment it has to be…so therefor should also be illegal?!…bloody perverted paps!!!

    • bjjjj

      Sexy ;-)

    • huseyin

      Just thik about she is in the her bathroom or some kind of room and having a pleasure wih her husbad.Let me ask this photographer “hey you, please tell me your rights and how to push yourself into this condition to get her naked pictures.Have you ever asked yourself is it wrong or false,i do not think you had.
      It does not matter it is bathroom or balcoony.They are all the same place and belongs to their private.Stupid media always doing this.Leave them alone forever.

    • Trigga90

      why won’t they show the pics without the censorship? thats whats sad

    • The itis

      This is the future that Orson Wells wrote about. Big Brother is always watching. Privacy laws havent kept up with technology. Its unfortunate but its the way it is.

    • http://twitter.com/s4sarz M Sarfraz Iqbal

      People do not like this as she is there princes but she is nothing in
      universe. on the other hand why now Europe forcing to close that
      magazine isn’t it freedom of speech?

 

Advertisement: