http://starcasm.net/archives/1618 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:43:36 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://starcasm.net/archives/1618/comment-page-1#comment-762 Starcasm Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:57:04 +0000 http://starcasm.net/?p=1618#comment-762 Holy crap! We are SO busted! When I was drawing that graph I was saying to myself, "Now which axis is for the dependent variable? Crap. Ah hell, nobody will know!" I hope we don't lose our blogging license! Holy crap! We are SO busted! When I was drawing that graph I was saying to myself, “Now which axis is for the dependent variable? Crap. Ah hell, nobody will know!” I hope we don’t lose our blogging license!

]]> http://starcasm.net/archives/1618/comment-page-1#comment-718 mark Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:11:57 +0000 http://starcasm.net/?p=1618#comment-718 On any graph, even humorous ones, you ought to keep the dependent variable on the y-axis, not the x-axis. It's just the polite thing to do. Thanks. On any graph, even humorous ones, you ought to keep the dependent variable on the y-axis, not the x-axis. It’s just the polite thing to do. Thanks.

]]> http://starcasm.net/archives/1618/comment-page-1#comment-655 mixxer Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:54:34 +0000 http://starcasm.net/?p=1618#comment-655 Her "co-star" doesn't seem to have aged at all! When was that photo taken? Perhaps another graph is needed to explain that phenomenon. Her “co-star” doesn’t seem to have aged at all! When was that photo taken? Perhaps another graph is needed to explain that phenomenon.

]]>